In 1976 Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde presented the following dilemma: “The liberal secular state lives on premises that it is not able to guarantee by itself. On one side it can subsist only if the freedom it consents to its citizens is regulated from within, inside the moral substance of individuals and of a homogeneous society. On the other side, it is not able to guarantee these forces of inner regulation by itself without renouncing to its liberalism.”
What answers can the liberal state offer to questions of social cohesion and ethical deficit that are affecting secularized democracies?
Are we living in a secular or a post-secular society?
Reset put these questions to some of the most influential international intellectuals.
“Political values are founded on notions of good” Charles Taylor
“Accepting diversity, as far as possible” Giuliano Amato
“Homogeneity is not indispensable” Ian Buruma
“Imposing homogeneity from above is a recipe for oppression” Bruce Ackerman
“Three-way (German) dialogue on post-secularism” Gian Enrico Rusconi
“It is impossible to separate religion and politics” Massimo Cacciari
“Liberalism is not neutral, but this is its very strength” George Crowder
“Falling back into the arms of Hegel Alessandro Ferrara
“Neither State, nor Church, but democratic self-government” Klaus Eder Send us
your opinion. Write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org